<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Observer Interactive - Latest Comments</title><link>http://observerinteractive.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://observerinteractive.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2011 00:51:43 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Newspaper Video Quality and Quantity</title><link>http://observerinteractive.com/2008/10/newspaper-video-quality-and-quantity/#comment-136477322</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The so-called "digital dividend" of very high quality radio spectrum, the airwaves on which wireless devices communicate, will be freed up by the Aug. ...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">small business seo</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2011 00:51:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Charlotte.com &amp;#8212; All Things Charlotte</title><link>http://observerinteractive.com/2009/10/charlottecom-all-things-charlotte/#comment-20809174</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is this site still affiliated with the Observer?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NB</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:24:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On Yahoo! and Media</title><link>http://observerinteractive.com/2009/07/on-yahoo-and-media/#comment-12868368</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Here's a 1996 shot in the Wayback Machine -- fun to see.  &lt;a href="http://web.archive.org/web/19961220154510/http://www.yahoo.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://web.archive.org/web/19961220154510/http://www.yahoo.com/"&gt;http://web.archive.org/web/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jason</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 09:22:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On Yahoo! and Media</title><link>http://observerinteractive.com/2009/07/on-yahoo-and-media/#comment-12844962</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I remember first accessing Yahoo and browsing the directory you mentioned, Jason. Yahoo felt like the Internet's table of contents back then. :) I may still have some printouts of those old pages. Because what else do you do with all that information? Print it out on dead trees!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adrian</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:44:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On Yahoo! and Media</title><link>http://observerinteractive.com/2009/07/on-yahoo-and-media/#comment-12831283</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As if on cue, Om publishes this:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://gigaom.com/2009/07/16/yahoos-number-ones-so-much-more-than-search/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://gigaom.com/2009/07/16/yahoos-number-ones-so-much-more-than-search/"&gt;http://gigaom.com/2009/07/1...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jason</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 16:05:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Read Comments (Or Not)</title><link>http://observerinteractive.com/2009/06/read-comments-or-not/#comment-12738705</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Angie! How are things going? @Jason: I used to work with Angie at The State.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">droberts</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:22:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Read Comments (Or Not)</title><link>http://observerinteractive.com/2009/06/read-comments-or-not/#comment-12738704</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Angie!  Thanks for letting me know -- good to see others commenting here and sharing what they've done.  I'm getting happier about my caveat by the day :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Curious, how'd you hear about this all the way in Portland?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jason</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 08:21:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Read Comments (Or Not)</title><link>http://observerinteractive.com/2009/06/read-comments-or-not/#comment-12738703</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The Portland Press Herald's Web site, &lt;a href="http://pressherald.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="pressherald.com"&gt;pressherald.com&lt;/a&gt;, also has been letting readers choose whether to see comments for nearly a year now.  We've gotten very positive feedback on being able to have the option.  (I'm online editor there.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Angie Muhs</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 07:09:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Read Comments (Or Not)</title><link>http://observerinteractive.com/2009/06/read-comments-or-not/#comment-12738702</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Dean -- ha! That's why I put the caveat in there.  I didn't look at &lt;a href="http://chron.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="chron.com"&gt;chron.com&lt;/a&gt;, but good to see other people listening to the users. Thank you for sharing and your comment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;@Gary -- user requests, mostly.  I get 100s of e-mails/month specifically about doing this or that on the site, and patterns are pretty easy to identify.  While there are not a LOT of people who want this, the people who do have a valid use case: they come to read the story, and they are more interested in that than the user comments.  Other users that like our comments have the same reasoning, just in reverse.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If technology can allow this type of choice, we always will want to listen.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jason</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:09:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Read Comments (Or Not)</title><link>http://observerinteractive.com/2009/06/read-comments-or-not/#comment-12738701</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The Houston Chronicle's Web site, &lt;a href="http://chron.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="chron.com"&gt;chron.com&lt;/a&gt;, lets its users hide comments (I'm the content director there), as do the regional Gannett sites, like &lt;a href="http://dmregister.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="dmregister.com"&gt;dmregister.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dean Betz</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:10:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Read Comments (Or Not)</title><link>http://observerinteractive.com/2009/06/read-comments-or-not/#comment-12738700</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting, Jason. Can you share some of the thinking that drove the decision to develop this feature?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gary O'Brien</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:27:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Twitter Handling</title><link>http://observerinteractive.com/2009/05/new-twitter-handlin/#comment-12738693</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Here's the first script we've written. It's the twitter2twitter script: &lt;a href="http://observerinteractive.com/2009/05/twitter2twitter-aggregator-script/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://observerinteractive.com/2009/05/twitter2twitter-aggregator-script/"&gt;http://observerinteractive....&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">droberts</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 10:56:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Twitter Handling</title><link>http://observerinteractive.com/2009/05/new-twitter-handlin/#comment-12738692</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ian, passed your comment on to Dave.  He's been very busy, but maybe he can slip it to you in an e-mail.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jason</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 15:40:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Twitter Handling</title><link>http://observerinteractive.com/2009/05/new-twitter-handlin/#comment-12738691</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes. Must. Have. Code.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ian</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 20:31:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Post Twitter Feeds Back to Twitter</title><link>http://observerinteractive.com/2009/03/post-twitter-feeds-back-to-twitter/#comment-12738682</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Given any thought about how to create a script that runs on cron every min or so to do this instead of waiting on twitterfeed?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I've worked some yahoo pipes into the mix to filter posts by several users via hashtags. So if they post with #news or #videos or whatever I choose, the feed gets those posts and retweets them to @kansascitystar. If they don't use the hashtags I don't pull it in, so they can have their personal account to use as normal and followers of The Star don't have to see when our morning news editor is eating a cheeseburger.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I really like this approach but you end up waiting on pipes and twitterfeed. I've found a few php scripts that pull a single feed and re-post it and with a little modification they could take multiple incoming feeds. Where my skills fall off is doing the hashtag filtering.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ian</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 20:26:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ThatsRacin.com v3.1</title><link>http://observerinteractive.com/2009/04/thatsracincom-v31/#comment-12738685</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The new site looks great.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 14:48:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Not How You Start</title><link>http://observerinteractive.com/2009/04/not-how-you-start/#comment-12738687</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Congratulations!  You had one of the nicest and best Pro team.  I've met Webb Simpson and his caddie William and they are both good people.  Watch for Webb's first of many wins on the PGA Tour.  He's got game and he's got the support of his family behind him.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ken Slaven</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 07:56:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Slow Death of Media Site Registration?</title><link>http://observerinteractive.com/2009/04/slow-death-of-media-site-registration/#comment-12738683</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great points here Jason. I have long hated having to login on newspaper websites in order to comment and I usually do not. I am more likely to move on and less likely to share that article with friends.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Some combination of Facebook Connect, Open ID, or email would suit most users' login preferences.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is also key to someone passing along the information.  Lowering the barrier to commenting allows users an easier path to investing in the content. The more invested a reader is, the more likely they are to share. Plus, you cannot bet what Facebook is doing with updates for user activity on your site. Especially for newspapers that are desperate to find new ways to connect to younger and online readers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Great post, glad my thoughts could contribute.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jason Keath</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 14:33:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PubsysEdit 2.1 Released</title><link>http://observerinteractive.com/2008/11/pubsysedit-21-released/#comment-12738672</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dave, I'm looking for a way to utilize the plugin with a tool for turning on and off a live video player. I have a php script written to fill in the embed code to a currently blank SSI. I want to be able to add the SSI to an html module that can sit on a section and when the logged in user clicks the pubsysedit tool they see some content that is not usually visible. What is the easiest way to make this happen?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ian&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ian</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:40:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Project vs. Product Management</title><link>http://observerinteractive.com/2009/02/project-vs-product-management/#comment-12738678</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Common discussion and frustration point with marketeers targeting Product Managers. It's an unfortunate word play. Truth is all Product Managers must manage projects. Sometimes many at once. So is project management a discipline of product management? No, I don't think so, no more than using a spreadsheet is. But project management certainly is a tool of product managers. I wish product managers vendors wouldn't be so afraid of it and embed this tool in product management solutions.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Val Workman</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 09:59:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thank you, NASCAR &amp;#038; Partners</title><link>http://observerinteractive.com/2009/01/thank-you-nascar-partners/#comment-12738677</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Stu, thanks for the time and support.  I do realize we didn't finish our chat, so let's set something up after you get free and clear of this week's follow-ups.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jason</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 10:04:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thank you, NASCAR &amp;#038; Partners</title><link>http://observerinteractive.com/2009/01/thank-you-nascar-partners/#comment-12738676</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dear Jason, Thank you very much for your time and perspective today. I've posted a link to this page on our Industry P.R. Rep Hub, and we look forward to seeing you at Lowe's Motor Speedway when we come to town in May and October. Thanks again, and good luck with the relaunch of &lt;a href="http://ThatsRacin.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="ThatsRacin.com"&gt;ThatsRacin.com&lt;/a&gt;. -- Stu&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stu Hothem</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 20:59:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PubsysEdit 2.1 Released</title><link>http://observerinteractive.com/2008/11/pubsysedit-21-released/#comment-12738671</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dave, just discovered this plugin. This is really a godsend. Thanks for doing this and sharing it. (I am looking forward to being able to toggle it off. ;) )&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 13:48:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: About The Authors</title><link>http://observerinteractive.com/2008/10/hello-world-2/#comment-12738636</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No worries on any comments or inquiries, Davis. It's my job to represent the company's interactive products.  And, just like the Observer's newsroom, you have the right to free speech and publish your thoughts (edgy or otherwise)!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I also know our event coordinator/O editor Steve Gunn and his fellow newsroom staffers thought it was a great event for all.  Each has said they learned something, which is a goal of any event like this.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Speaking of the activities, I would be remiss if I failed to mention that Jason Keath is the man that put the event together, and he works elsewhere.  It's his overall efforts that made the day happen.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;-Jason&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jason</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 08:34:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: About The Authors</title><link>http://observerinteractive.com/2008/10/hello-world-2/#comment-12738635</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi, Jason. Sorry to have cornered you at the WordCamp with questions about how to get a blog in the Observer. You're probably only asked that about 50 times a day. It was a great event, though, and a great way to meet and network with fellow bloggers. The O is to be commended for pulling something like this together. Feel free to check out my slightly skewed review of the day at &lt;a href="http://davisw.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="davisw.wordpress.com"&gt;davisw.wordpress.com&lt;/a&gt;. Sorry in advance about any snide remarks about the Observer -- I was trying to be "Internet edgy". Thanks again. -- Davis&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Davis Whiteman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 08:05:20 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>